It seems we can’t agree on this one….

Whose fault is it when we can’t agree on the CTG? #EFM #CTG #CTGInterpretation #CentralFetalMonitoring
Electronic fetal monitoring

Whose fault is it when we can’t agree on the CTG? #EFM #CTG #CTGInterpretation #CentralFetalMonitoring

We really have no idea what we are doing when it comes to fetal blood sampling during labour. Maybe we should stop doing it.

CTG monitoring is in use during a woman’s labour. The fetal heart rate pattern is now abnormal. As her maternity professional, you know that the positive predictive value of the CTG is low, and want to avoid caesarean section unless it is going to improve the fetal outcome. And you don’t want to misidentify when caesarean section is a great idea and as a result have an avoidable poor outcome […]

We expect that evidence based guidelines are written by people who can critically review and use evidence. Sometimes that’s not what happens though. Here’s an example….

Can you record an EEG signal with a fetal spiral electrode? And why might you want to?

How are we doing when it comes to talking to women about fetal monitoring options and respecting their decisions? #InformedChoice #SharedDecisionMaking #MidwiferyContinuityOfCare #RespectfulMaternityCare

Medical indications exist somewhere on a spectrum between being written on tablets of stone, handed down to new doctors by a supreme being on a mountain top – to being completely made up on a whim. What happens when they are misused?

Can we get CTG monitoring to improve outcomes by adding extra bits to it? A summary of what I have previously written.

Is it better to find the fetal heart rate using two different technologies at the same time rather than just one?

Measuring outcomes in fetal monitoring research: there’s more to it than at first glance.