CTG monitoring in the Netherlands

This is what CTG monitoring practice looks like in the Netherlands. How does this compare to where you are?
Electronic fetal monitoring

This is what CTG monitoring practice looks like in the Netherlands. How does this compare to where you are?

Does our risk assessment process around CTG monitoring make sense?

My wish list for new research about fetal monitoring in labour. @ProfJennyGamble

The problem with guidelines is not that they exist nor that they play a role in structuring good practice. The problem is when guidelines over-reach their purpose.

Myself and my co-authors have a new paper, freshly published with Women and Birth (available here). One of the questions I asked while generating data from my doctoral research was – who made the decision about the approach to fetal heart rate monitoring that any individual woman would use during her labour? At first glance, the answer seemed to be that no one was actively making decisions. I didn’t interview […]

Whose fault is it when we can’t agree on the CTG? #EFM #CTG #CTGInterpretation #CentralFetalMonitoring

We really have no idea what we are doing when it comes to fetal blood sampling during labour. Maybe we should stop doing it.

CTG monitoring is in use during a woman’s labour. The fetal heart rate pattern is now abnormal. As her maternity professional, you know that the positive predictive value of the CTG is low, and want to avoid caesarean section unless it is going to improve the fetal outcome. And you don’t want to misidentify when caesarean section is a great idea and as a result have an avoidable poor outcome […]

We expect that evidence based guidelines are written by people who can critically review and use evidence. Sometimes that’s not what happens though. Here’s an example….

Can you record an EEG signal with a fetal spiral electrode? And why might you want to?