How are we doing when it comes to talking to women about fetal monitoring options and respecting their decisions? #InformedChoice #SharedDecisionMaking #MidwiferyContinuityOfCare #RespectfulMaternityCare
Medical indications exist somewhere on a spectrum between being written on tablets of stone, handed down to new doctors by a supreme being on a mountain top – to being completely made up on a whim. What happens when they are misused?
Keen to read more about the history of maternity care? Here are some suggestions….
Can we get CTG monitoring to improve outcomes by adding extra bits to it? A summary of what I have previously written.
Is it better to find the fetal heart rate using two different technologies at the same time rather than just one?
Measuring outcomes in fetal monitoring research: there’s more to it than at first glance.
What do CTG machines actually do in a clinical setting?@ingrid_jepsen @EllenBlix @HelenCo02211683 @StineAdrian @MidwifeMaude
I’ve written quite a bit about what the research says about CTG use during labour. Here’s a collection of posts for people who want to explore further.
Research findings linking poor outcomes with abnormal CTG patterns reinforce the message that CTG monitoring isn’t effective. Why aren’t we talking about it?
I’ve updated this blog post to include new research findings. (Spoiler: oxygen therapy still doesn’t work)
Birth Small Talk 