Are you saying we should stop doing CTGs?

We can’t keep pretending that #CTG monitoring is working.
Today’s post shares the back story behind our paper. #CTG #EFM #PerinatalMortality #CP
@TransformingMCC
@ProfJennyGamble
@MarySidebotham
@GriffithMidwifery
Computerised interpretation of the #CTG with #INFANT doesn’t save healthcare costs. It is time to abandon it.
The history of maternity care is essentially the story of men trying to make sense of women as a mysterious “other” to men. This is true of the history of fetal heart rate monitoring too.
Most high-income countries require maternity clinicians who work with women during labour to attend regular courses on the use and interpretation of CTG monitoring. I’ve been to more than a few during my time – but I have never been to an education session where there was a specific focus on how to use and interpret IA.
Today’s post takes up back to the basics and discusses what CTG monitoring is (and isn’t).
Unlike Dr Who, we can’t drop into our future timeline to see what the consequences of our current decisions are. If we could, would we make different choices?
I quite like Doctor Who. One of the common threads in the show involves the Doctor warning their companions that it is important not to meddle with the past in a way that might alter the future. Of course, what inevitably happens is that the Doctor and companions end up being compelled take action in order to ensure that everyone arrives at the end of the episode happy and healthy, […]
Someone took a little rant of mine and turned it into something wonderful!
Does CTG monitoring generate more harm than benefit for babies? Here’s the evidence….