The Dublin randomized controlled trial published in July 1985 aimed to determine the effectiveness of continuous fetal monitoring (CTG) over intermittent auscultation during labor. The trial found no significant differences in outcomes for babies. Despite its findings, CTGs remained widely used. It’s time to do something about that.
A recent review examined the relationship between abnormal heart rate patterns in CTG monitoring and various neonatal outcomes. While some links were identified, particularly with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, overall connections were weak. The evidence suggests CTG monitoring may not be as clinically useful as presumed, prompting calls for alternative monitoring methods.
As I have been refreshing older blog posts, I realised I never did get around to writing about antenatal CTG use. Today’s post solves that gap! What is antenatal CTG monitoring and when is it used? Mostly I write about the use of CTG monitoring during labour. But this is not the only time CTGs are used in maternity care. Maternity professionals also use CTGs during pregnancy in an attempt […]
Birth Small Talk 