Central fetal monitoring systems gather data from CTG machines and show it in a central place. While aimed at improving outcomes this has not been proven in research. Midwives reported disruptions in response to what was seen at the central monitor, leading to altered care practices focused on documentation over support for birthing women. It is time to pause and think, rather than continue to accept the introduction of these systems.
Women planning a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) often seek to avoid negative experiences with CTG monitoring. This new mini-course offers reliable information on fetal monitoring options during VBAC, cutting risks down to realistic size, and providing communication strategies with care providers.
A Japanese research team compared human and artificial intelligence performance in analyzing CTG data to predict perinatal asphyxia. Clinicians slightly outperformed AI in accurately diagnosing affected babies. However, limitations raise concerns, emphasising the essential role of healthcare professionals over machines in maternity services.
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) aim to enhance maternity care by improving decision-making consistency and safety. A systematic review points out concerns over potential biases and the effectiveness of CDSS amid varying clinical contexts. More robust research is needed.
Today’s post reflects on a 1959 trial concerning “fetal distress”. It highlights findings that meconium was a critical indicator of poor outcomes, while abnormal fetal heart rates weren’t reliably predictive. Should we be reevaluating current obsessions with CTG use and focusing on alternative clinical markers?
The Fetal Monitoring Academy offers a comprehensive library of resources for fetal monitoring, merging previous courses and adding new modules. It operates on a subscription basis, providing ongoing access and a supportive online community, the Common Room, for collaboration. Enrol before February 19, 2025, for an early bird discount.
In 1910, suffragist Helen Todd highlighted the importance of women’s voting rights for improving working conditions, coining the phrase “Bread for all, and Roses too.” While maternity services focus on physical health (Bread), there is a pressing need to enhance women’s emotional and experiential birth outcomes (Roses), fostering joy and meaning in the process.
In a trial comparing fetal blood sampling to digital fetal scalp stimulation for assessing fetal wellbeing, recruitment fell short, concluding early after just 534 participants. Despite showing a significantly lower caesarean section rate with scalp stimulation, the small sample limits the findings. The irony of guidelines undermining evidence development is discussed.
Prevalence-induced concept change is a psychological phenomenon where the meaning of a concept shifts due to declining frequency of related events. Over time, the definition of “high risk” in maternity care has expanded despite reduced perinatal mortality, leading to shifts in CTG usage.
A comprehensive literature review by researchers in the UK examined the safety of CTG monitoring in maternity care, identifying prominent system-level issues, including unsafe organizational cultures and inadequate staffing. It is import to focus on staffing, supportive environments, and respectful care to improve outcomes rather than unproven practices.
Birth Small Talk 